TOY STORY 4 PLANS REVEALED

DisneyPixar

TO INFINITY AND BEYOND!

Nearly two decades after Pixar Animation Studios created the world’s first computer-animated feature film with “Toy Story,” it revealed plans for Disney•Pixar’s “Toy Story 4,” an adventure that returns audiences to the world of the studio’s signature characters.

John Lasseter, director of the original “Toy Story” and “Toy Story 2,” will direct the film, which opens a new chapter in the lives of Woody, Buzz Lightyear and the “Toy Story” gang. The story was dreamt up by Lasseter, Andrew Stanton, Pete Docter and Lee Unkrich, the storytellers who have been the driving force behind all three “Toy Story” films.

“We love these characters so much; they are like family to us,” said Lasseter. “We don’t want to do anything with them unless it lives up to or surpasses what’s gone before. ‘Toy Story 3’ ended Woody and Buzz’s story with Andy so perfectly that for a long time, we never even talked about doing another ‘Toy Story’ movie. But when Andrew, Pete, Lee and I came up with this new idea, I just could not stop thinking about it. It was so exciting to me, I knew we had to make this movie—and I wanted to direct it myself.”

Writing team Rashida Jones and Will McCormack (“Celeste and Jesse Forever”) joined the project, and Pixar veteran Galyn Susman (ABC’s “Toy Story OF TERROR!” and “Toy Story that Time Forgot”) is producing.

The film is slated for release on June 16, 2017.

ToyStoryMeeting

Director John Lasseter works with members of his story team on Disney•Pixar’s “Toy Story 4,” a new chapter in the lives of Woody, Buzz Lightyear and the “Toy Story” gang. The film is slated for release on June 16, 2017. (Photo by Deborah Coleman / Pixar)

MINIONS- In Theaters July 10th, 2015

Minions Image 1

The story of Universal Pictures and Illumination Entertainment’s Minions begins at the dawn of time.  Starting as single-celled yellow organisms, Minions evolve through the ages, perpetually serving the most despicable of masters.  Continuously unsuccessful at keeping these masters—from T. rex to Napoleon—the Minions find themselves without someone to serve and fall into a deep depression.

But one Minion named Kevin has a plan, and he—alongside teenage rebel Stuart and lovable little Bob—ventures out into the world to find a new evil boss for his brethren to follow.

The trio embarks upon a thrilling journey that ultimately leads them to their next potential master, Scarlet Overkill (Academy Award® winner Sandra Bullock), the world’s first-ever female super-villain.  They travel from frigid Antarctica to 1960s New York City, ending in mod London, where they must face their biggest challenge to date: saving all of Minionkind…from annihilation.

Featuring a soundtrack of hit music from the ’60s that still permeates our culture today, Minions is produced by Illumination’s Chris Meledandri and Janet Healy, and is directed by Pierre Coffin and Kyle Balda.  Brian Lynch has written the screenplay for the 3D-CG comedy adventure, and Chris Renaud serves as executive producer of the film.  www.minionnation.net

Genre: 3D-CG comedy adventure

Cast: Sandra Bullock, Jon Hamm

Directed by: Pierre Coffin & Kyle Balda

Writer: Brian Lynch

Produced by: Chris Meledandri, Janet Healy

Executive Producer: Chris Renaud

BIG HERO 6

BIG HERO 6

BIG HERO 6Big Hero 6 is the first animated movie based on a Marvel property and hopefully, if this film is any indication of what they can do, it won’t be the last one. Very loosely based on the Marvel comic book series of the same name, but with a Disney spin on it, it is completely different form the original concept. In fact it seems they chose an obscure title so they could truly make it their own, and they sure did, resulting in one of the most fun movies I’ve seen since Guardians of the Galaxy. It seems that Marvel at the movies can do no wrong and Disney may have received a bargain, when they bought Marvel for 4 billion. This is just the latest in what is sure to be a smashing success.

The basic story is about a young teenager named Hiro Hamada, who lives in the fictional futuristic city called San Fransokyo. Hiro is an aimless robot prodigy who spends his days and nights hustling people in robot fighting underground events. Hiro is extremely close to his older brother Tadashi, who has more noble goals when it comes to applying his own brilliant scientific mind. Tadashi has invented a robot health care companion named Baymax, to help heal the world. However, due to an event that may be too scary or intense for very young children, Hiro decides to take Baymax and seek justice. Using his incredible scientific brain, he basically “Iron Manizes” Baymax to make him more formidable. Hiro and Baymax are far from the only stars of this film and his brother’s friends and schoolmates are all geniuses in their own right. They soon join the fight, with Hiro using his genius to improve their inventions to give each of them mechanical superpowers. And a brand new superhero team is formed.

There is tons to like in this movie,  and a lot of humor (which I’m glad to see returning to superhero projects). Some minor annoyances were as follows:

  • the term “health care companion” was repeated over and over and over again to the point that a more paranoid man might find as brainwashing children. The sheer amount of times it was used, plus the term itself, made it seem odd.
  • scenes that seemed to be for the express purpose of eventual Disney rides, a little too blatant for my taste.

Other than those minor complaints, the movie was extremely enjoyable. Not sure I’d take someone under 5 or 6 to it due to a couple of scenes, but then again the classic Disney cartoons were also intense too so maybe I’ve been wussified as a parent. All in all, a great movie that will hopefully result in more Marvel animated films in the theater.

FINAL SCORE:

B+

MALEFICENT BLU-RAY REVIEW

This blu-ray review of Maleficent will be an unusual two part review as the only time I have seen the movie is on the Disney blu-ray so I will be going over the movie and the quality of the disc.

Maleficent is a retelling of the classic Sleeping Beauty movie but from the point of view of the villain. Disney purists may have a problem with it but lets face it, the original was also a retelling of a classic story so get over it people. However, as this is Hollywood and Hollywood is rarely original, this film borrows heavily from Wicked (which tried to humanize the Witch from the Wizard of Oz) and from bad sword and sorcery movies from the 80s. With admittedly much better effects. The sad thing is, with a better hand at the helm and a more focused vision, this could have been a classic film. Unfortunately it’s not. Outside of Angelina Jolie, who dominates the screen every time she has a scene, the rest of the cast and movie is just blehh.

As for the blu-ray itself, while being short of extras that are truly worthwhile, I will say that the video and audio quality are out of this world beautiful. For fans of the movie, you would be hard pressed to find a more beautiful way to watch it.

FINAL SCORE:

  • Movie – C
  • Blu-ray – B+

ALEXANDER AND THE TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY

ALEXANDER AND THE TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY

In the latest family film from Disney, ALEXANDER AND THE TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY, Disney does what it used to do best which is make goofy, family safe movies. Back in the day you could picture this movie on Sunday nights on the Wonderful World of Disney. Steve Carrell, who could be the new Dick Van Dyke of Disney, and Jennifer Garner play the parents of four kids of various ages living in the kind of place you only see on Disney. Tons of slapstick humor and goofy jokes, along with the usual life lesson and happy ending. Is it a movie I’d see on my own? Definitely not even though the actors al ldid a fine job. If my kids were young again and I took them to see it, I’m sure I’d enjoy it a lot more through their enjoyment.

 ALEXANDER AND THE TERRIBLE, HORRIBLE, NO GOOD, VERY BAD DAY

So bottom line here, no great surprises here but young kids should enjoy it and nothing offensive for the parents.

As an adult I’d give it a C-.

For kids B

YOU’RE NOT YOU – AN UP AND DOWN TEARJERKER

YOU'RE NOT YOU

Anyone who knows me knows I despise over the top, over-wrought drama and flavor causes of the moment so it was with great trepidation that I went to see the movie, You’re Not You starring Hillary Swank, Emmy Rossum and Josh Duhamel and directed by George C. Wolfe. Truth be told, the only reason I saw it was because of the fabulous Emmy Rossum who is one of my favorite actresses out there, PERIOD! So I sat down in the theater and was extremely pleasantly surprised. And not just because of the magnificent Emmy but because of all the actors, though the movie still was melodramatic at times.

The basic story is Hillary plays a young affluent woman named Kate who is stricken with ALS and Emmy’s character Becca plays her hot mess of an aide. Drifting through one job after another, musically talented but a coward when it comes to her musical career. And to no one’s surprise, they become close and learn from each other. And Josh Duhamel, in an EXTREMELY surprising performance, is the so-called picture perfect husband Evan. Sounds hokey right? Well this is where the biggest surprises for me came in. Instead of going for the cheap drama, or making the characters one-dimensional such as Josh’s Evan character, each one is portrayed in a very realistic multi-dimensional manner. For example Evan, in most other directorial hands, would have been the typical asshole and there would have been more manipulative drama during Kate’s hard times. Yet only one scene in the movie, did I shake my head at and it was during the baby scene where I felt it was over done. Not to say it was perfect because Kate was often portrayed too much as a disease and not a person, take of that what you will.

The acting throughout was superb, specifically Emmy Rossum as Becca, and Josh Duhamel, who gave a very subtle a layered performance. I give credit to the director too because even the smaller actors playing smaller parts, such as Ali Carter and Ed Begley Jr. were great. Those two really impressed the hell out of me in this film, with Ali showing amazing depth for what should have been a superficial role, and the always great Ed Begley Jr. being the uncle everyone wishes they had. Great job by both of them.

So while not my typical genre, I must say that I enjoyed this movie and was very very impressed by all involved. You’re Not You……Tearkerker done well.

Grades

Film – B

Directing – B+

Acting – A

MILLION DOLLAR ARM BLU-RAY

Million Dollar Arm

One of my favorite movies of the year, Million Dollar Arm, is now available on DVD, Blu-ray VOD etc and my enjoyment has not diminished one iota. I’ve heard the criticisms of it being predictable and corny and if it WASN’T A TRUE STORY, I’d understand. But it was and it’s a great story with some great performances from the whole cast, especially Jon Hamm.

As for the Blu-ray itself, the video and audio quality were very good, but the features were somewhat light. If you care about tons of extras, the blu-ray will disappoint. But for me, the movie is the big selling point and I just think it’s terrific.

Movie (after second viewing) A

Blu-ray B

ORIGINAL REVIEW HERE

FROM CHARACTERS TO CARICATURES | BIG BANG THEORY

Big Bang Theory

One thing that always points to a show going downhill, and fast, is when a character or characters on a show become parodies of themselves. Sometimes it’s their own fault, sometimes it’s the writing but either way it’s cringe inducing. Now most people just blindly follow a show because it’s like fried chicken to them, comfort food that is probably bad for you, but regardless of how comfortable it feels it’s still bad.

Here are some examples of this bad metamorphosis:

  • Ross and Monica from Friends. When they started the show, Ross was a sweet, slightly nebbishy type of guy and Monica was also sweet and mothering in a way. They both had their quirks but nothing too unbelievable. By the end of the show, Ross was a freak show and Monica became this shrill, loud unlikeable character.
  • Barney from How I met Your Mother. No character had slid down as quickly as Barney did. It was almost like Neil Patrick Harris forgot how to play the part, perhaps all his theater work made him forget how to act “non-theatrically” and subtle. By the end it was painful to watch. Compare any episode in the last few seasons with the final scene in the Possimpible classic to see what I mean.
  • Alan Harper in Two and a Half Men. Similar to Ross, he started out as a decent nice guy who wasn’t great with women and struggled in life. But still an admirable guy. He then turned into this moochy, effeminate, weirdo devoid of any redeemable qualities whatsoever.

So who’s next? I’m sad to say but based on the first two episodes of the Big Bang Theory season 8, it looks like Jim Parsons has caught the Neil Patrick Harris disease. Did he act in theater in the off-season? Because he is way overdoing it and a show that has been consistently solid and enjoyable, is in danger of losing it. maybe the money has gone to his head or maybe the writers are out of ideas and feel that louder is better. But I hope they fix it soon or else Bazinga, the show is done creatively.

THE NETFLIX OF COMICS

From January 21, 2012:

Comics need to figure out how to evolve and quickly or else they’re done. The more I think about it, the more I love a Netflix type of subscription. It’s almost like a TV network where there is limited space so only some shows stay on and some some get replaced. Same here as it would not be financially smart to flood the market with titles if people are paying a flat monthly fee. Yet because of that very same flat fee, fans would try new titles and new creators, since their paying the same money and it’s all included. So the choice would not be, do I drop these titles, but do I drop comics completely (less likely if the price is low enough).

I think if they really pushed this, there could conceivably be 200-300K minimum monthly subscribers. With a price of 10-20 a month, the gross revenue would be 2-3 million in rental income. Spread among no more than 20 monthly titles and you got something going on. This would not include advertising or one-click sales for individual titles to own or the fact that this would feed people into merchandise and trades etc. It would less product but higher profits. And there is so much more you can do digitally than with paper titles.

I still think this is a great idea. Here is how I’d do it.

  • $7.99 rental fee per month basic plan.
  • $13.99 Gold Plan (includes 10 free monthly purchases)
  • You get to read every single comic that comes out. You can read them for 90 days, then they’re gone.
  • If you like a comic, you can buy it for $.99 and have it stored in your locker (or downloaded) forever. The Gold plan allows your first 10 purchases to be free.
  • Social media, rate the books etc. would be built in and contests for sharing, commenting and so on.
  • With the data engine this system would know what you like, don’t like and where you’re located. Lots of possibilities could be had such as:
    • Recommendation engine too so if you gave the latest Captain America 3 stars or higher, it would recommend a trade paperback for you with a coupon to buy it
    • The coupon would be good at the nearest store (which the app would know) and auto-generated.

And so much more is possible. Thoughts? CLICK HERE AND TELL ME

FIXING DC COMICS

It’s no secret that I believed that DC comics relaunch, called the Nu52, was a complete misfire from day one. I’ve called it the Heroes Reborn of DC, referring to the ill-advised Marvel Heroes Reborn series back in the day, done by some Image Comics guys. This one, spearheaded by Jim lee (and Image founder) and Geoff Johns (who has lost his mind) has the same awfulness. Characters done so poorly, attempted modernization that fails to capture any of the basic essence, a whole universe that just feels wrong. I can’t remember another time as awful creatively at DC, than this one. So one of my friends on an infamous comics message board asked me what I would do if I were in charge of DC comics. For posterity, I’ve reprinted it below.

First from March 7, 2012:

Believe it or not, my criticisms are based on business, and business only. Maybe not in the 80s when I was a hard-core comics fan and hated JB’s Superman (which was an understandable business decision). That’s the way my mind works now. It’s why I admired Jobs so much, despite all the legitimate complaints about Apple. It’s not about “I don’t like how comics are being done creatively because I personally don’t like it” it’s about bad business decisions. If they came out with a comic line based on the movies, or changed the Ultimate Universe to resemble the movies, I’d be fine with it, even though I’m not a fan of the characterizations. My tastes have nothing to do with it. It would be a smart business decision since many do love it.

Here’s an example. I hated Joe Q’s creative reign at Marvel. For the most part (pre Civil War) I left it alone because it was working, it just wasn’t my tastes. When I did complain, it was stuff that they did that I felt took out the appeal of superheroes, hurting it with new and younger readers, like the abolishing of secret identities, something kids find cool but older numb fans might want. When Cap died, or Superman turned blue, I didn’t say a word, those were not harmful, just temporary gimmicks. Stupid maybe but pretty much harmless.

So as someone who wants comics to survive, and maybe thrive, I have concerns about what is happening. Comics are a hard enough thing for someone who never read comics to get into. So the strategy, to me, is a follows.

1) Keep the existing fans. Make it easier financially to keep reading the monthlies AND easier for them to pick up a different title.

2) Try to bring back fans that left for whatever reason, the quickest and easiest way to increase readership. They are already familiar with the trappings etc. of comic books.

3) Try to bring in new readers who have a similar bent as comic fans, i.e. fans who may like manga, sci-fi etc.

4) Get the new generation, kids, to get hooked.

For me, businesses that don’t nurture and care about their existing customer base are stupid. So for numbers 1 and 2, DON’T piss them off. Sometimes it’s a simple change and it hurts nothing, except the temporary shock buzz you may get. Like renaming Earth 2 to Earth G or whatever. A simple creative decision like that satisfies what you supposedly want (a new earth to play in), yet lets the old time fans have hope for the return of THEIR earth 2 someday. The only thing you lose is some buzz from PISSING off old timers. Other things you can do is chose creative teams that understand this and artists who fit the character. For example, some things DC did do right is the artists they chose for some of the books, Nightwing’s art is very good for that character, same with WW, JLA and Birds of Prey. Someone like Mahfood should not be on a mainstream superhero title; it is a bad business decision. Now maybe on a new title that might appeal to number 3 on the list but not on the big books. I don’t care how much you value them as a friend or whatever. Focus on the MAJORITY of your fan base, not the few.

 

And now my solution from March 7, 2012:

As for being EIC, after this Nu52, it would be very tough to undo all of this. But there are standard things I’d do, such as trimming the line, really push digital in creative ways and cutting the price of the monthlies or going the manga sized books for $4.99.

It’s also tough as I’d be part of a much larger company so my choices are different than if I owned DC.

Creatively, I’d work out some deal with Alex Ross for covers and a yearly mini-series that perhaps, would be digital only. Not sure yet on that. I’d fully separate the universes again but keep it small, no more than 5. Not saying there wouldn’t be an unlimited variety of universes for cool “what if” type stories (I’d never limit the possibilities) but 5 universes and 5 lines to reflect them. Make the DC universe feel less crowded. Superman is less special when you have Captain marvel etc. roaming around.

Get good karma by fixing the Alan Moore issue with no demands from him.

So I’d do the following:

Earth 1 (or Prime or whatever). The main DC universe, Superman was the first, no time references such as started in the 90s etc. The titles would be as follows:

Superman (the manga sized book) with the old numbering, for history sake. Covers by Ross. A main Superman story, told in the classic sense and 3 other arcs of supporting characters, such as Supergirl, Superboy whatever. Allow slow artists, like Hughes to do an arc then insert them in and out when ready. One or two reprints related to one of the main stories, then text and sketches from one of the creatives involved. Make it a thick full read, something that could be sold in multiple outlets and a cover to attract new readers. Each arc would be available digitally separately so the digital product is different than the print. No long ongoing arcs in the manga books, let them be suited to stay on the shelves longer. The most popular arcs get reprinted into trades, again different than the books. Maybe even a creator spotlight.

Same for Batman and JLA. These three books would get you a full universe of reading by themselves.

Monthlies (for now) as follows (day and date):

Wonder Woman, drawn by someone who can draw gorgeous women, but nothing overtly sexual (see Alan Moore’s Glory notes)

The Flash

GL (another possibility for a manga sized book because of the other Lanterns, would wait on this first).

Teen Titans (year two launch)

And another 5 + books I’d need to think about.

Other 100 page plus manga sized books.

Fawcett Comics, sent on their own earth, another manga sized book, cover by Ross or the equivalent, with a main CAPTAIN MARVEL book, and arcs with Mary, Jr, Spy Smasher etc.

Same with Charlton Comics.

Earth 2 – The Golden Earth. This would be set in real time and the main book would be the JSA. There would be one ongoing backup arc that goes over various points in that history so on could be the birth of Batman’s daughter or the 60s or whatever. On this earth, things change and every generation can have their own heroes. Maybe Superman’s son is the main Superman now and he has a different costume(s). Different supporting cast etc. Make it feel full of history.

DC (no name for it yet) that is a big fun comic, based on the cartoons, sold at the grocery stores, full of 4-5 stories, games, puzzles, upcoming cartoon and movie news and a little history. Heavily discounted, a safe book for parents to buy for their kids. Each book would have a secret code that gets them 3 free digital comics of their choice.

Vertigo, same thing. This would be also reprinted in actual manga dimensions sized books too.

A creator owned big book. Make it easy for creators to launch and distribute their creations, the physical book would allow their first three issues to be spotlight in an arc before moving to a digital ongoing. Very generous royalties. A good will loss leader.

Crossovers between the universes would be rare, and all in one. A Superman / Captain Marvel battle would mean something again.

Multiple ways to sell the same story and make money.

Find ways to transition the stores to the new realities, i.e. more trades, toys, becoming a hangout, affiliate online stores, bigger discounts and free digital copies of every monthly they buy (not the manga sized ones). Allow the bigger ones to be distributors, enabling pooling purchases.

Completely revamp the DC website to be a glorious geek filled treasure of online goodness. True Wiki’s, creator blogs (not political, just about what they are doing or fun stuff) galleries, free full comics, games, fan board. Retailer (online or offline) spotlights, FAN spotlights. A place you can hang out for hours.

Finally, tease this for months and have a huge announcement for the press at Comic-Con or another separate event. Think like the Apple announcements. Build up a buzz.

This is just a start.